The most used types of arguments

It is important that we learn to have the necessary capacity to be able to argue and defend our ideas without having to resort to argumentative fallacies, which is why it is necessary that you know the types of arguments most used, so that you can better understand the processes and their operation to seek maximum efficiency when arguing.

The search for the perfect plot

It is clear that we all want to always be right, and the truth is that this makes us have to resort to unwise tactics such as the use of lies or clichés to support our theories.

The problem is that at the moment of carrying out an argument we think that it is the only moment in which one of the two arguments will win, so we do everything possible to be the winners. However, the truth is that argumentation can be a fantastic way of knowing better about those issues that we precisely defend without having the proper notions, since during an argumentation we will become aware of the weak points which we can work more strongly to achieve. make our argument stronger.

These are the types of arguments you should know

Next we are going to show you the most important types of arguments that we can highlight in today's society, thus having the reason why we argue differently depending on the situation.

Data-driven arguments

It is a type of argument that focuses only on specific and concrete data that have been obtained from experimentation, either from us or from third parties.

It is generally used with the aim of give strength to an argument through what is called empirical supportSince there are elements that demonstrate a reality, they cannot be debated unless it can be demonstrated, also empirically, another different reality.

Arguments based on definitions

In this case, we are not based on the way the world works, but on the use we make of each concept that passes through our hands. That is, we make a particular interpretation based on what we have learned from our environment, which can be a valid or invalid argument, since it is not really supported.

Arguments based on descriptions

As for the arguments based on descriptions, we would talk about the search for several arguments that will be the ones that will help us to defend a certain idea, but always from the point of view of the description of the elements that are part of that idea.

Arguments based on experiments

It is an argument that is based on an experience that occurred in the same place where it is being debated, in such a way that it seeks to defend one's own ideas but always focused on those experiences.

Arguments based on authority

It is a type of argument in which greater value is given when it comes from the authority. Basically we are facing an argument that habitually resorts to fallacies in order to be or seem true.

A good example is when we believe in the opinion of a specialist for the simple fact that he is a specialist, that is, when a doctor gives us an assessment, when a geologist tells us about the characteristics of a mineral, etc., basically people considers that it is an argument of authority and therefore assumes that it is true, but we must not forget that specialists are often carried away by their own opinions or may even have false information in their hands, so it is necessary to contrast this data to be really convinced that it is an argument based on authority as well as based on data.

Arguments based on comparison

In this case, what we do is compare two ideas facing each other, so we look for which of them is more true. This can be very effective in some cases, but keep in mind that the fact that there are only two ideas can often mean that neither of them is as close to reality as it should be, leading to the conclusion to be drawn. can get is that one of them may be more true, but it does not mean that it is a totally true concept.

Arguments based on the fallacy

This is one of the arguments that we use the most when debating, especially when we do not have clear notions about the issue we are defending, and it is basically based on lies that aim to defend our own idea and attack the opposite idea.

However, fallacious arguments are often left in the air because they are easy to detect and easy to attack, since, if the opponent has a minimum notions about the subject, with a little data he can refute with what listeners will lose confidence in the one who has used the fallacious argument, as it is a clear sign of the absence of valid arguments.

Arguments based on interpellation

The objective of this type of argument is to try to make the person who has made the speech fall into a trap within that same speech, forcing the contradictions in such a way that it is possible to find out if it is really a person who has all the information necessary to talk about the subject or, on the contrary, you are just repeating a series of concepts but not fitting them properly within the general idea.

Value-based arguments

Value-based arguments are those that focus primarily on the ethical values ​​of the person who uses them, regardless of whether they are positive or negative values.

This is a type of argument widely used today, but it is not always correct because it is a fantastic alternative when a topic related to morals or a philosophical concept is under discussion. However, it is an invalid argument for the rest of the topics since it lacks objectivity since it is an exclusively subjective argument, that is, it can help us to draw conclusions about our priorities and the way we see things, but it does not allow us to It will serve to reach an objective conclusion on a specific topic.

These are the types of arguments most used today, which, as you can see, range from those that are irrefutable to others that aim to use fallacies to defend an idea for which there is not enough data.